Head Office Activities
Aktivitas Kantor Pusat
🔬 Section M — Professional, Scientific & Technical
In Bali: a PT PMA cannot register this code
National procedure — does not apply to a PT PMA in Bali
In Bali this activity is reserved for micro/small/medium enterprises and closed to a PT PMA. The national procedure below applies only to non-PMA operators.
Head-Office Activity: Open Nationally, Unregistrable for PMA in Bali
Head-office work is nationally open to full foreign ownership, but Bali’s scale structure means a PT PMA cannot register it there today.
In Bali, the decisive fact is simple: a PT PMA is Usaha Besar, while this activity has no Usaha Besar scale row.
What You Need
The licensing path below is the national procedure, valid for a foreign-owned company outside Bali (e.g. Jakarta). In Bali, this activity is currently reserved for micro/small/medium enterprises and closed to a PT PMA — [derivation under review] OSS has no Usaha Besar scale row -> reserved for UMKM; a PT PMA (Usaha Besar by law) cannot register. [structural] — NOTE: the licensing rows this verdict's risk tier was read from have since been set aside as unverifiable for KBLI 2025, so the verdict cannot currently be re-derived; verdict pending re-derivation from the true risk tier (GARUDA-FILIERA). See the Bali status badge above before planning a Bali setup.
Licensing
Post-issuance obligations
Next step
Direct match from KBLI 2020. Holding companies were holding companies then, and they're holding companies now. The code, scope, and classification are unchanged.
Bali Intelligence
KBLI 2025 Consulting & Professional Services: The Safest Sector for Foreign Investors
kita.balizero.comRegulatory Divergence
The licensing previously shown for 70100 was removed because its source could not be verified as applying to this activity. Here is what the sources actually say — with citations.
Correction note — verbatim, with source locators
KBLI 2025 code 70100 'Aktivitas Kantor Pusat' (head-office activity) carries canonical status_mapping='MATCH_LANGSUNG', kbli_2020_source=None, pp28_sources=['70100'] (self-referencing). Per the Lot 5 conductor gate report (§3, Adjudications item 4 and §1 category table), this code is quarantined as source_absent_in_vault — the THIRD of the three true D1-clean-vs-D5-problem seat-agreement divergences (with 66211 and 66224): the crosswalk mapping itself reads clean 1:1 in both directions (the lane's own read), so no alternate ancestor or false-parent claim is asserted here (unlike 68123/68126 above); the defect is that the self-cited pp28_sources=['70100'] cannot be independently confirmed against the pinned vault sources this cure has access to — an honest gap in verifiability, not a demonstrated falsity (F12: this describes what OUR verified sources can confirm, never a claim about regulatory non-existence). The canonical record additionally carries a `_source_relabeled` note (dated 2026-06-27) asserting "content is OSS-RBA-2025 per _l1/_l2" — i.e. claiming this code's per_skala content is independently grounded in the OSS risk-based-assessment dataset via the record's own `_l1_source`/`_l2_status` fields, which if true would mean the served licensing content (distinct from the disputed crosswalk citation above) rests on independent provenance. The Lot 5 conductor gate (§3, Adjudications item 4) ADJUDICATED this dispute this session by direct read of the record's own structured markers, which REFUTE that prose claim for the per_skala layer specifically: the record carries NO `_l2_source` key at all (verified this session — absent, not merely null) and `_l2_status='no_oss_risk'` (the OSS risk-based-assessment endpoint returned nothing usable for this code — the opposite of what the relabel note's prose implies); `_l1_source` (OSS_RBA_2025_id_version_fff4053d) covers judul/uraian only, never per_skala. Meanwhile the vault-exhaustive PP28 hunt for this code is ABSENT (21 files / 11,208 pages scanned, nothing found). Per the TRACK-P doctrine (structured markers win over unverified prose), the `_source_relabeled` note is read as a label-only fix (PP28_2024->PP28_2025 filename correction) whose content-provenance aside is itself unverified prose, not independent proof of the per_skala row's grounding — it does not override the structural absence documented above. Detach STANDS. The served per_skala row itself (a single low-risk NIB-only obligation, 'Menyampaikan laporan kegiatan secara berkala') is plausible on its face for a head-office code and is not flagged as topically contaminated; per the pilot's standing detach-over-plausible-remap discipline, however, an unverifiable source pointer is still cured by detach (rule #9 — no field exists to mark a citation 'unverified-but-plausible' short of removing the reliance on it). per_skala detached; the licensing regime for head-office activity is not retrievable/verifiable from the pinned sources as hunted. Lot 5 conductor gate (SIGNED), run wf_0f7438f4-a41, 2026-07-19.
The detached licensing rows (source unverified for this activity)1 row
These rows were previously shown on this page and have been detached — the correction note above documents, with source locators, why their source could not be kept for the activity this page describes. They are preserved here as the audit trail of the divergence.
Sources & Verification
Each data layer below traces to a government source with its KBLI vintage — or is declared as a gap. Nothing in these layers is silently filled in.
Title and scope as defined by the KBLI-2025 classification.
locator: OSS_RBA_2025_id_version_fff4053d
The previously-served rows were removed because their source could not be verified as applying to this activity. See Regulatory Divergence above for the documented correction note.
The investment-list annexes predate KBLI 2025; the per-code crosswalk audit of this layer is in progress. The value shown is the annex text, disclosed with its vintage.
This activity is reserved for micro/small/medium enterprises and closed to a PT PMA · confidence LOW.
Dataset last updated 2026-07-26 · KBLI 2020 and KBLI 2025 reuse code numbers for different activities — cross-vintage rows are labeled, never merged silently.
Can foreigners operate a head office activities business in Indonesia?
What license is required for KBLI 70100?
What is KBLI 70100?
How did KBLI 70100 change from KBLI 2020 to 2025?
Related Codes
Tourism Management Consulting
Aktivitas Konsultansi Manajemen dan Bisnis Pariwisata
Tax Consulting
Aktivitas Konsultansi Pajak
Industrial Management Consulting
Aktivitas Konsultansi Manajemen dan Bisnis Industri
Accounting, Bookkeeping & Auditing
Aktivitas Akuntansi, Pembukuan, dan Pemeriksa
General Management Consulting
Aktivitas Konsultansi Manajemen dan Bisnis Perdagangan
Notary & Land Deed Official
Aktivitas Notaris dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah
Ready to register this business?
Bali Zero handles PT PMA setup, KBLI registration, NIB, and all licensing for KBLI 70100.
PT PMA Setup
IDR 20.000.000
Company registration, KBLI, NIB, domicile
Virtual Office
IDR 5.000.000
Legal address for your PT PMA in Bali
5,000+ companies registered since 2020
Get started on WhatsApp